<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SimplicIT Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog</link>
	<description>IT as it should be</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:34:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Cloud Debate by Ryan Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=323&#038;cpage=1#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=323#comment-262</guid>
		<description>When SMBs venture into the cloud, they are buying SaaS and managed services. Enterprises are still managing their own services -- just using the cloud to replace on premises hardware solutions. This is the only distinction I was trying to make.

The rest of your comment reads in defense of the cloud, something I was not attacking. The data for ransom may be FUD*, but hosted LOB apps with shared databases is a very, very real security concern. But I digress.

Cloud is a buzzword; it encompasses everything from Mozy to EC2, Microsoft Exchange Hosted Services to co-loc servers. Which is why distinctions must be drawn when discussing the cloud.

As far as managed services and SaaS for SMB - which is what I was addressing -  it isn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;the revolutionary future of business IT that we all must act on immediately!&lt;/i&gt;.  It&#039;s simply the direction computing is moving.

SBS businesses will integrate the cloud, but the benefits at the enterprise level aren&#039;t necessarily worthwhile for them. And, most importantly, they won&#039;t all be retiring all of their servers for a monthly SaaS bill any time soon, which is what they&#039;re being told.

&lt;em&gt;* it happens. and is more likely to happen with off-site storage. that&#039;s all.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When SMBs venture into the cloud, they are buying SaaS and managed services. Enterprises are still managing their own services &#8212; just using the cloud to replace on premises hardware solutions. This is the only distinction I was trying to make.</p>
<p>The rest of your comment reads in defense of the cloud, something I was not attacking. The data for ransom may be FUD*, but hosted LOB apps with shared databases is a very, very real security concern. But I digress.</p>
<p>Cloud is a buzzword; it encompasses everything from Mozy to EC2, Microsoft Exchange Hosted Services to co-loc servers. Which is why distinctions must be drawn when discussing the cloud.</p>
<p>As far as managed services and SaaS for SMB &#8211; which is what I was addressing &#8211;  it isn&#8217;t <i>the revolutionary future of business IT that we all must act on immediately!</i>.  It&#8217;s simply the direction computing is moving.</p>
<p>SBS businesses will integrate the cloud, but the benefits at the enterprise level aren&#8217;t necessarily worthwhile for them. And, most importantly, they won&#8217;t all be retiring all of their servers for a monthly SaaS bill any time soon, which is what they&#8217;re being told.</p>
<p><em>* it happens. and is more likely to happen with off-site storage. that&#8217;s all.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Cloud Debate by Theron Conrey</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=323&#038;cpage=1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Theron Conrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=323#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Starting from the top, you split out Enterprise cloud, and SMB cloud. You then equate these differences as services vs. servers.  

The line can&#039;t be servers vs. services, as enterprises of EVERY size manage application stacks on top of the physical (and virtual) layer that is both internally and externally present in their environment.  

Email, sharepoint, file management, line-of-business applications, databases,  VoIP, whatever, are all just applications or services running on infrastructure.  

If I can add a virtual shim in between these applications (and OS) and the infrastructure it runs on, and then dynamically expand the resources when needed, when they require them, maybe even provision new resources, this is another value add of a virtualized environment.  This isn&#039;t Cloud though.

The SMB rarely has the scale to leverage all of the features, as well as the scale required to quickly deploy additional resources, to make this a financially sound venture, but large enterprises, and service providers do.  This will be the first divide, the private and public clouds.  We&#039;re already seeing it.  EC2, vCloud Service Providers, and others, are building environments to leverage shared resources, in a multi-tenant environment, leveraging scale of resources to overcome purchasing power of the SMB, to leverage enterprise level functionality.  The enterprise, like MMC, the company I just left, is also making steps to roll out massive scalable internally oriented clouds, with their customers their internal assets.   

When it&#039;s all said and done, if there is no competitive strategic value of a function, why is the SMB doing IT?  Most don&#039;t manage their own PBX platform anymore, but leverage a managed service (hosted VoIP, quest, mediacom), and you can see that this has now become more of a commodity offering.

How is buying hardware, managing an OS, loading software, doing backups internally, recovering, managing hardware contracts any different?  What strategic value does this provide?

Even backup software has moved over to the &quot;service&quot; catalog.  Mozy is a great example of this.  software and service bundled to the end user / smb to leverage a larger shared external infrastructure.

Servers, desktops, and other services aren&#039;t any different.

A virtual server to load my custom &quot;value add&quot; application on, a managed exchange environment, a managed virtual desktop environment, a managed end to end VoIP solution.  All easily scalable.  On demand.  This is the &quot;cloud&quot;.

Re: Data for Ransom and Data security.  This argument is bigger than understanding what cloud is, a conversation I&#039;d be glad to have.  A short response though, It&#039;s FUD.  Go ahead and insert whatever conversation you have with your customers when you sell mozy here, and then add on what you do when you help a customer port a phone number.

Cloud isn&#039;t a buzzword. It&#039;s here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting from the top, you split out Enterprise cloud, and SMB cloud. You then equate these differences as services vs. servers.  </p>
<p>The line can&#8217;t be servers vs. services, as enterprises of EVERY size manage application stacks on top of the physical (and virtual) layer that is both internally and externally present in their environment.  </p>
<p>Email, sharepoint, file management, line-of-business applications, databases,  VoIP, whatever, are all just applications or services running on infrastructure.  </p>
<p>If I can add a virtual shim in between these applications (and OS) and the infrastructure it runs on, and then dynamically expand the resources when needed, when they require them, maybe even provision new resources, this is another value add of a virtualized environment.  This isn&#8217;t Cloud though.</p>
<p>The SMB rarely has the scale to leverage all of the features, as well as the scale required to quickly deploy additional resources, to make this a financially sound venture, but large enterprises, and service providers do.  This will be the first divide, the private and public clouds.  We&#8217;re already seeing it.  EC2, vCloud Service Providers, and others, are building environments to leverage shared resources, in a multi-tenant environment, leveraging scale of resources to overcome purchasing power of the SMB, to leverage enterprise level functionality.  The enterprise, like MMC, the company I just left, is also making steps to roll out massive scalable internally oriented clouds, with their customers their internal assets.   </p>
<p>When it&#8217;s all said and done, if there is no competitive strategic value of a function, why is the SMB doing IT?  Most don&#8217;t manage their own PBX platform anymore, but leverage a managed service (hosted VoIP, quest, mediacom), and you can see that this has now become more of a commodity offering.</p>
<p>How is buying hardware, managing an OS, loading software, doing backups internally, recovering, managing hardware contracts any different?  What strategic value does this provide?</p>
<p>Even backup software has moved over to the &#8220;service&#8221; catalog.  Mozy is a great example of this.  software and service bundled to the end user / smb to leverage a larger shared external infrastructure.</p>
<p>Servers, desktops, and other services aren&#8217;t any different.</p>
<p>A virtual server to load my custom &#8220;value add&#8221; application on, a managed exchange environment, a managed virtual desktop environment, a managed end to end VoIP solution.  All easily scalable.  On demand.  This is the &#8220;cloud&#8221;.</p>
<p>Re: Data for Ransom and Data security.  This argument is bigger than understanding what cloud is, a conversation I&#8217;d be glad to have.  A short response though, It&#8217;s FUD.  Go ahead and insert whatever conversation you have with your customers when you sell mozy here, and then add on what you do when you help a customer port a phone number.</p>
<p>Cloud isn&#8217;t a buzzword. It&#8217;s here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iowa Gaming Commission hack: What we can learn. by [G13net] &#187; Small Business Security</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=312&#038;cpage=1#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>[G13net] &#187; Small Business Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=312#comment-209</guid>
		<description>[...] recently came across this post at the Iowa Technology Blog about security in small businesses.  I wanted to add a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently came across this post at the Iowa Technology Blog about security in small businesses.  I wanted to add a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iowa hack just a screw-up. Chinese gov not involved. by Iowa Gaming Commission hack: What we can learn. &#124; Iowa Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=297&#038;cpage=1#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Gaming Commission hack: What we can learn. &#124; Iowa Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=297#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments       &#171; Iowa hack just a screw-up. Chinese gov not involved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments       &laquo; Iowa hack just a screw-up. Chinese gov not involved. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 12 Technology Mistakes Small Businesses Make: #12 by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=260&#038;cpage=1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=260#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Great article! I totally agree.

@DMJoe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! I totally agree.</p>
<p>@DMJoe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iTunes and Quicktime by Yan Herndon</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=214&#038;cpage=1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan Herndon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=214#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Here is a kaseya script that removes all the itunes crap.  It could be run after the update.

Script Name: Apple Crapple
Script Description: Apple Crapple
Removes itunes updater and Quicktime Task from startup and removes quicktime icon from desktop.  Kills bonjour service

IF True 
THEN
   Delete File - (Continue on Fail)
     Parameter 1 : %SYSTEMROOT%\TASKS\AppleSoftwareUpdate.job
         OS Type : 0
   Execute Shell Command - (Continue on Fail)
     Parameter 1 : &quot;C:\Program Files\Bonjour\mDNSResponder.exe&quot; -remove
     Parameter 2 : 0
         OS Type : 0
   Delete Registry Value - (Continue on Fail)
     Parameter 1 : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\iTunesHelper
         OS Type : 0
   Delete Registry Value - (Continue on Fail)
     Parameter 1 : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\Quicktime Task
         OS Type : 0
   Execute Shell Command - (Continue on Fail)
     Parameter 1 : ERASE &quot;%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Desktop\QuickTime Player.lnk&quot;
     Parameter 2 : 0
         OS Type : 0
   Execute Shell Command - (Continue on Fail)
     Parameter 1 : ERASE &quot;%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Start Menu\Programs\Apple Software Update.lnk&quot;
     Parameter 2 : 0
         OS Type : 0
   Write Script Log Entry
     Parameter 1 : Apple Software Update Disabled
         OS Type : 0
ELSE
   Write Script Log Entry
     Parameter 1 : Apple Software Update Not Scheduled
         OS Type : 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a kaseya script that removes all the itunes crap.  It could be run after the update.</p>
<p>Script Name: Apple Crapple<br />
Script Description: Apple Crapple<br />
Removes itunes updater and Quicktime Task from startup and removes quicktime icon from desktop.  Kills bonjour service</p>
<p>IF True<br />
THEN<br />
   Delete File &#8211; (Continue on Fail)<br />
     Parameter 1 : %SYSTEMROOT%\TASKS\AppleSoftwareUpdate.job<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
   Execute Shell Command &#8211; (Continue on Fail)<br />
     Parameter 1 : &#8220;C:\Program Files\Bonjour\mDNSResponder.exe&#8221; -remove<br />
     Parameter 2 : 0<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
   Delete Registry Value &#8211; (Continue on Fail)<br />
     Parameter 1 : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\iTunesHelper<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
   Delete Registry Value &#8211; (Continue on Fail)<br />
     Parameter 1 : HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\Quicktime Task<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
   Execute Shell Command &#8211; (Continue on Fail)<br />
     Parameter 1 : ERASE &#8220;%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Desktop\QuickTime Player.lnk&#8221;<br />
     Parameter 2 : 0<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
   Execute Shell Command &#8211; (Continue on Fail)<br />
     Parameter 1 : ERASE &#8220;%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Start Menu\Programs\Apple Software Update.lnk&#8221;<br />
     Parameter 2 : 0<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
   Write Script Log Entry<br />
     Parameter 1 : Apple Software Update Disabled<br />
         OS Type : 0<br />
ELSE<br />
   Write Script Log Entry<br />
     Parameter 1 : Apple Software Update Not Scheduled<br />
         OS Type : 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More WiFi Concerns by Wireless Security Update &#124; Iowa Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=53&#038;cpage=1#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Wireless Security Update &#124; Iowa Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=53#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] More news on the wireless security front. WPA has been cracked, again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More news on the wireless security front. WPA has been cracked, again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe is not our friend&#8230; by Adobe is no one&#8217;s friend&#8230; &#124; Iowa Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Adobe is no one&#8217;s friend&#8230; &#124; Iowa Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=115#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] month I blogged a rant about Adobe. It was really just venting because of the vuln situation at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month I blogged a rant about Adobe. It was really just venting because of the vuln situation at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Deficient Anti-Virus by Loren Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.simplicitiowa.com/blog/?p=89&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iowatechblog.com/?p=89#comment-4</guid>
		<description>At ChicagoCon this year there was a highlight talking about this very issue that with the mass amount of new malicious software certain anti-virus programs go from being a tool of defense to nothing more than a resource hog. With massive overseas interest ( particularly Russian Business Network ) in malware people can actually purchase engines to bypass and corrupt multiple anti-virus engines. I can understand how hard it must be for these companies to protect people from what hasn&#039;t been created and the overwhelming job it must be to keep on top of it. Very interesting post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At ChicagoCon this year there was a highlight talking about this very issue that with the mass amount of new malicious software certain anti-virus programs go from being a tool of defense to nothing more than a resource hog. With massive overseas interest ( particularly Russian Business Network ) in malware people can actually purchase engines to bypass and corrupt multiple anti-virus engines. I can understand how hard it must be for these companies to protect people from what hasn&#8217;t been created and the overwhelming job it must be to keep on top of it. Very interesting post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
